Category Archives: General

I’ve been deemed a “computer guy” by my parents and friends simply because I know how to re-install Windows, add RAM, and use the T-Bird RSS feed reader. Being a computer guy means that I’m a free 24 hour help desk.

Pure Networks has a solution to most of my family’s problems, which eventually turn into my problems. I got a chance to see it working in action at the Connections Conference held in Burlingame [read: San Francisco Airport area]. Install the Network Magic program on each PC in your house, and start networking. The program does what windows should do, makes networking computers easy.

Share printers, see who’s online, restrict little Timmy’s computer until he has finished his homework, see if the router is the reason for a lost connection or if it’s your wireless signal. One of the questions I get asked the most is “how do I know if someone’s stealing my wireless internet”, Network Magic will tell you. Stay tuned as there is a very high possibility that LIVEdigitally will produce a full review on this in the near future!

**Sorry Mac fans, this is only available for the PC. But then again, Macs network easily without 3rd party help!

The Hyatt Regency, a beautiful hotel located south of San Francisco kicked off the 9th Annual Connections Conference today. Companies from around the world came together in order to share their different home connection innovations. A woman by the name of Tina Sharkey from AOL stood before us for the keynote speech. She started off with a few numbers pertaining to a day in the life for AOL:

53% of all people who are on the internet manage to make their way to the AOL network.
1.83 billion Instant Messages are sent. (heck, I can allot for half of that)
392 million emails
560,000 blogs posted
20 million photos shared
AOL holds exclusive music sessions, similar to an MTV unplugged session (but they are plugged), and rapper 50 Cent generated 6.1 million streams from that the first day.
Continue reading →

Today marked day one of three, for the 9th annual Connections Conference. Parks Associates and CEA have pulled together to host this fine event. The Digital Home Conference and Showcase promised a few exciting things to me this evening. We are looking forward to streaming lots of information from a central location of the house, using the existing power sockets to control devices in your household, viewing your home surveillance camera via your mobile phone, and networking all of your home computers without hours and hours of headaches. All of these great new tools plan to be delivered in the near future.

The conference spans Wed to Fri with speakers from companies such as Intel, Motorola, Cisco, and Yahoo! to name a few (and to name drop). I’ll be there, and not so square. Stay tuned for the next four or five days while LIVEdigitally brings you the new technology that just may end up in your home.

be happy =)

You may have seen these on an episode of MTV cribs yesterday. But Oakley has some nifty sunglasses out. The Thump, a line of sunglasses with ear buds on the bars where it overlaps your ears, (if my terminology is incorrect, it is because I do not wear glasses). Remarkably, it’s an mp3 player built into your sunglasses. The price is steep, $545 for the below…

“256 megabytes of solid-state NAND flash memory for storing up to 60 songs
The best polarized lenses on the planet
Absolute music freedom with no wires or cords to dangle or tangle
Up to 6 hours of playback time
75MHz DSP with 18-bit Sigma Delta DAC for state-of-the-art audio fidelity
Acoustic expansion speakers with forward/back booming and sideways pivoting
Flip-up lenses with raked-back contours for maximum protection against sun, wind and side impact
Patented XYZ Optics® for razor sharp clarity at all angles of vision, even at lens periphery
Plutonite lens material blocks 100% of all UVA, UVB, UVC and harmful blue light
Durable O Matter® frame with less than 1.8-ounce total weight for all-day comfort
Supports storage of data files along with song files
Includes high-speed USB cable for transferring song files from Mac or Windows PC”

It’s a great start to a very unique idea for an industry that probably has not had a lot of digital technology infused into it. I”m waiting to have camera’s built in with cell phones as well. Listen to some tunes, while you are driving, and you can even tape an accident while it happens, or record a robbery in progress.

Without going into tremendous detail, a quick history of digital music and consumer usage patterns is as follows:

• Early 1990s: advanced computer users first start using MP3 technology to achieve between 5:1 and 15:1 compression of music from CDs onto PC hard disk drives
• Mid-to-late 1990s: the masses of Internet users rip (or record) their first CD to their PC
• 1999: The Diamond Rio PMP-300 portable MP3 player is launched
• 2000-1: Roughly 80 million people around the world “share” MP3 files using Napster 1.0, which allowed people to easily find and download music. Napster gets sued into oblivion
• 2002-3: The first legitimate MP3 streaming services are launched, with low adoption rates
• 2003-4: RealNetworks buys Rhapsody, iTunes launches, MSN Music launches, Napster 2.0 launches. Apple announces the 250 millionth download. The 4th generation iPod ships, with Apple retaining 92% market share of hard-drive MP3 players. Rhapsody’s music collection is almost 1 million tracks, available to over a half a million subscribers.

There’s a lot more to it, some interesting, some not, but it is safe to say that consumers are trending toward using the Internet as a reliable source for discovering and acquiring music. Both legal and questionable methods are alive, all to varying degrees of success. Fundamentally, the forces in play are enabling access to music in (predominantly) one of two fashions: downloadable files and streaming files.

For this article, we present both perspectives, independent of each other. Dan McMinn, founder of dmp3 music discusses the importance of downloading and owning music files. Meanwhile, BigToe addresses the value of access to streaming music files. Please note that both articles were written without either author consulting with or reviewing the other’s work.

Streaming…

It is the Winter of 2005, and as I ponder the relative value of streaming versus download-based music services, I look at what usage models consumers have with music listening. Fundamentally, there are two places where people listen to music: places where they have Internet access, and placed where they do not. Yet.

Between WiFi and WiMax, UWB, and 3G, there are literally tens of billions of dollars being spent to give me access to the Internet from any location on (or, thanks to Lufthansa, above) Earth. The entire city of Philadelphia is getting free wireless (assuming Verizon can’t stop them). Even McDonald’s has hotspots now.

This means I have access, at (virtually) all times, to any available online music library. Several companies, past and present, have enabled me to stream my own music collection from the home. This of course presumes I have ripped my CDs, installed software, and am willing to leave a computer on at home at all times. And I am not.

The library I choose is Rhapsody. For $9.99 per month I have access to about a million tracks.

What’s that? Didn’t hear that right? Yes, one meelleeontracks. For perspective, I have ripped 800 CDs to create my collection of roughly 11,000 files. This is a mere one percent of Rhapsody’s music collection. In fact, if you think about the amount of time I spent ripping CDs and correcting errors in metadata, I’m sure it ‘cost’ me more than a few years’ worth of Rhapsody subscription dollars.

To be fair, I have some eclectic music tastes, including a lot of world music, some great classical and opera, and a variety of jazz and movie scores which are hard to find on Rhapsody. Also, the service is missing The Beatles and Dave Matthews, but other than that, it tends to cover 95% of the music I want to hear.

More importantly, I am always finding new music. A good friend of mine called me up and asked if I had heard of Jem (NOT truly outrageous!). Once I heard, I saw the Rhapsody link to the soundtrack of the OC. On which was an awesome cover of OMD’s If you Leave. Two links later and I was hearing Yellow Squared. The next day, while listening to Esthero and Delerium, I found Sarah Cracknell and Saint Etienne, then Zero 7 and Air.

Ooh, I forgot to mention the Rhapsody Radio service! Pick out 10 artists, and boom – instant radio station. If the station accidentally plays something I don’t like, I can even skip the track (up to about forty times per hour I believe). A huge differentiator for Rhapsody is the music programming is done by people who love music! It does not take much time browsing through the collections or listening to their radio stations to see (or hear) the difference between them and your local (ClearChannel) radio station, blasting out the hits they’re paid to play.

Let’s see where we are… I have an amazing selection of “on-demand” music and an even wider offering of radio services. Because I pay by the month, it doesn’t matter if I listen to a single track over and over again, or hear a full CD, or make a huge playlist that goes for hours. I can add anything I want to my virtual library, and I can listen at my leisure. On the other hand, with a download or track purchase model, I am effectively penalized should I select something I don’t really like. If I tire something, too bad – I paid for it, I ‘own’ it now.

So where’s the downside? The pesky iPod is out there messing it up for everyone. The iPod creates a model by which I need to own music, and I need access to it without an Internet connection. And with 4 million sales in Q4 of 2004, it doesn’t look like they are the pet rock of our generation. In fact, one might argue that an iPod is an essential element of living digitally. Okay, fine, so Rhapsody and the others will launch a download service to complement the streaming service. Done!

It was three years ago when I ripped my CD collection, and within a couple of months I had my Rhapsody (then listen.com) subscription. My MP3s are gathering virtual dust. I wonder if I’ll look back at My Music folder one day and reminisce.

–BigToe of LIVEdigitally

Not Streaming…

In the past month or two, a lot of us have probably seen it – Napster’s launch of a huge campaign that essentially lays down the gauntlet, getting to the crux of the file-based vs. subscription-based digital music conundrum. Of course they give it their own spin, but the question Napster poses is certainly a valid one: If you are the slightest bit interested in building a digital music library, why would you in your right mind pay $.99 per song at iTunes when you can pay $15 per month to have unlimited access to Napster’s full library of 1,000,000 songs? Well, I’m here to tell you why.

First off, let it be said that there is most likely room in the market for both models. The reason for this is pretty much the same reason there is room for the rent vs. own concept to exist in any market. Depending on your personality type, combined with your desired financial and emotional investment, you’ll choose one or the other.

Before we talk about finance, personality and emotion, however, let’s talk about the brass tacks that get at the root of the file-based vs. subscription based models. File based models (fees are per song/album) allow the user full ownership of music files they have purchased and downloaded, with relatively unlimited restrictions on what they do with it. iTunes is currently the king of this world. Subscription-based models (one monthly rate) ‘stream’ music that the user can ‘rent’, select and customize, but use is much more restricted. Basically, you end up purchasing and downloading a song or album (on top of the subscription rate) if you want to have less restricted use. Rhapsody and Napster are currently the biggest players in the subscription world.

So maybe now you’re saying “OK, I see the pros and cons, and you get a bit more if you pay more… yada yada”. However what Rhapsody and Napster aren’t telling you is that they’ve locked grandma in the basement, she’s not well, and if she finds her way out there will be hell to pay, big time. So I will spare you that fate and share a few dirty little secrets:

With Napster and Rhapsody (as things currently stand), you can’t share your music with others (or make it mobile) easily and freely. With iTunes it’s pretty much anything, anyhow, anywhere. Yes, iTunes has protected files, but they stretch the term ‘fair use’ about as far as they can while still keeping the record companies happy. With Rhapsody and Napster, consolidating an existing mp3 library (maybe the CD collection that dmp3 Music has ripped for you?) into the set-up is either not allowed or is a pain, depending on which service you choose. So, you either lose easy access to the music you already own, or you lose track of what music you rent vs. what music you own. To top it off (and I think this is the real kicker), say you’re rolling merrily along with Rhapsody loving life that you’re paying $10 a month, you’ve built a huge kick-ass music library with tons of great playlists and… Whoomp! a better subscription service comes along. Maybe you decide you want to switch to iTunes or (even better), you want to switch to a Mac platform entirely. Maybe you just want to cancel your subscription so you don’t have to pay $10 a month FOREVER. Well, guess what? You can say bye-bye to all your music and all the work you’ve done to personalize it. With the file-based model, you may need to convert to another file format in order to go elsewhere but at least you keep your music. Finally, one look at the interface and usability of iTunes (smooth, silky, simple) vs. Rhapsody/Napster (cluttered, chaotic, clunky) should be enough in and of itself to make the choice pretty easy. I know, this isn’t supposed to be about iTunes vs. The Others but some things just need addressing.

In all truth though, it really comes back to the idea of rent vs. own. Do we ever really want to rent for the long term? Renting is something we do in the short term for a quick fix, and if it is long term it’s for something that has little emotional or personal attachment. Why should we think that music will be any different? In fact, music seems a least likely candidate for the rental model because of its highly personal, emotional nature. As one friend put it, signing up with Rhapsody “would be kind of like renting shoes”.

Is music important to your life? Is it something you are extremely passionate about? Do you set aside time to be with your music? Do you want control and freedom with it? Is it a style or personal statement for you? Are you more interested in quality than quantity? If the answer is yes to all of the above, then the file-base model is for you, pure and simple – you want to own your music, you want to do whatever the hell you want with it whenever you want, and you don’t mind paying a reasonable price for it. If music is important but not critical, maybe more of sidebar to your life than a soundtrack, the subscription model may work out just fine. But beware that you won’t be getting anything more than (at best) a glorified, personalized radio station.

-Dan McMinn of DMP3 Music

Most techies are also sci-fi fans. At a young age I remember my dad trying to explain what it meant to “Grok” something. Ironically enough at my tender age, I couldn’t understand it.

Knowing what it means now, I think it’s a great name for a search engine. Unfortunately Grokker, the visual search engine, doesn’t really live up to its name.

First off, it’s powered by Yahoo. Maybe I’m a search engine snob, but I often find that Yahoo’s results just aren’t as good as Google’s. But more important than that, its innovative design, while fun to play with, doesn’t really help you get to where you want to go.

But like I said, it is a fun layout to click around with. Check out the results for “LiveDigitally,” and see the different relationships we have to other sites.

The news I’d like to share with you today comes from this article. It talks about Hollywood studios requesting that digital TVs be designed with anti-piracy technology in place. Ok that’s fair, they don’t want people stealing stuff. However, I take issue with their threatening response to the FCC’s comment about how they can’t dictate how televisions or other similar devices are designed. I quote: “Hollywood studios say the ruling, if upheld, would discourage them from producing first-rate shows for over-the-air TV.”

Their comment would sort of imply they were shipping out first-rate shows right now. In which case I say to Hollywood BRING IT! Let’s see the second and third rate shows. If they lack plot, humor, drama, good acting they’re still not shocking me yet.

It would have been a much better threat if Hollywood had said the following: “The ruling, if upheld, would discourage them from continuing to flood the television with non-stop images of scantily clad attractive people attempting to act or avoid being voted off the island.”

They could have gone one further, if they really wanted to get something done. Hollywood COULD have said “In place of our first-rate programming, we will begin flooding over-the-air television with a veritable deluge of scantily clad, horrendously unattractive people.”

Such a threat would have one of two effects. Either a, it would help continue the transition many people are making towards cable and satellite for entertainment or b, it would shut down pirating activities at once.

I hope someone in Congress sees the merit of my solution, seeing as the battle over anti-piracy technology is now in their hands.

This small little ball plays 20 questions with you when you are trapped in the car with your grandmother and that strange grandmother smell.

Based on 20q.net, the ball will ask you questions that you can reply to with “yes,” “No,” “Sometimes” and “Rarely.” By the end of the 20 questions, the ball has to guess who you were thinking of. It’s a technological spin on one of the oldest games there is.

While 20q.net learns with every person it plays with, this ball’s artificial intelligence is static, but it’s still reported to be staggeringly sharp.

After a quick listen in on Leo Laporte’s podcast of TWIT (This Week In Tech, which is the new name for Return of The Screen Savers) I heard about and visited a site which put a quick smile on my face. BoxedThoughts.com is just that, thoughts in a box. You register a name (numbers only) and post away! The filter takes out all url adds, screen names, email addresses, and all other internet space junk.

The range of emotions people generate yet are not able to fully express is captured right here on this nook on the net. It also is a nice monotony breaker for the cubicle ridden 9-to-5er’s

Tianyutek, a company whose name I do not dare try and pronounce, sent me a little message about a foldable piano.

From what… echem the company says, it sounds like this roll-up piano is similar to the Keytare from the 80’s. Yes the keyboard-guitar infusion that rocked ever so hard, until everyone realized they sucked. But now, you can rock on your keyboard and roll it up before anybody sees you pretending to be Amadeus. The material looks pretty light, so you could stuff your pants with it when you are done and act like David Bowie from Labyrinth.

Also, I will try extra hard to stop all references to the 80’s for, a good week.