• About

LIVEdigitally

Category Archives: General

Old Laptop + Flickr + chewing gum = SlickrFrame

Posted on April 6, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

I just blogged about digital picture frames last week and lo and behold my bud Dave Zatz pointed out to me someone’s Macgyvered themselves their own Flickr-enabled digital picture frame.  Cool! 

Even cooler, Gizmodo and others (including Sling Media) joined forces to make a little contest. All you have to do is tag some of your photos “slickrframe” between now and next Wednesday, and you can win some cool gear!

I went through some of my photos, tried to pick a few that might entertain the guy.  Here’s my entries…

Posted in General | Leave a comment |

Why I gave up on mobile email, and why you should too

Posted on April 6, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

One of the first posts I ever wrote on this lil ol blog o mine was entitled “Blackberry or Crackberry?”  Since that time, I did end up using a Blackberry a few more times, typically when I was traveling overseas and had a loaner phone/email device.  Hated it.  I hate that little red flashing light.  It’s a beckoning sign of evil, coming straight from Google the devil.  It causes malice.  I’m convinced of that.

Even without the dreaded device (and I guess this is about the right time for me to make a point absurdly clear: the Blackberry is unquestionably the best mobile email device ever made), I still had mobile email through the end of last year, mostly with a Sprint PPC-6700.  Also a great device, but the email experience was a lot more mellow than the Blackberry.  Maybe it’s because Windows Mobile didn’t implement it quite as well as RIM, I’m not sure.  I’ve also tried the Q, the Blackjack, the Dash (love the Dash), the HTC MTeoR (love it too), and others.  All good for mobile email.  All gone from my life.

I’m 4 months free from my last mobile email, and I don’t know what metric there is to use, but I’m unquestionably happier about it than ever.  I’ll tell you something else – I haven’t missed a deadline, opportunity, or any other work-related event as a result.  Yes, that’s right – life seems to progress even if my email doesn’t come in 30 seconds after I land at an airport.

With my new Samsung SCH-u740 (can they not come up with a better name for this device?), I have the option to get mobile email activated.  I’m not doing it.  And its not as if my email flow is that much lower than in the past, it’s just that I’ve consciously chosen I don’t want mobile email in my life.  The reason?  Mobile email access makes your life worse.

You can call it a quality of life thing.  You can call it a digital zen thing.  You can label this behavior however you choose, but I can say this with certainty: I don’t know or encounter anyone with mobile email who doesn’t act tethered.  Having mobile email means you are giving other people control over how you spend your free time.  It doesn’t liberate you from work, that’s really just how people convince themselves to carry the anchor with them. 

And don’t just take my word for it…

“With 67 percent of respondents admitting to having used a wireless device to connect to work while on vacation, signs indicated that the American workforce may be facing burnout,” she added.

Posted in General, Mobile Technology | 7 Comments |

Comcast makes already mediocre DVR just a bit worse

Posted on April 3, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

I can’t confirm the stat (since I’m making it up), but I’ll go out on a limb and say TiVo’s product satisfaction rate probably hovers around 90%.  Echostar’s DVR is generally very well-liked by many of it’s customers.  Heck, even the tiny fraction of Windows Media Center Edition owners who use their PCs as DVRs claim it’s phenomenal.  And then there’s Comcast.

For HDTV DVR services, Comcast uses the Motorola DCT6412 set-top box, a unit that is simply plagued by defects nationwide.  Ask someone who owns this unit, odds are pretty good they’ll talk about their problems at length, and complan how much they hate it.  My friend Ryan was so frustrated by his unit (which is definitely defective) that he blogged about it.

I walked into my living room this morning to find my wife watching TV and when she pulled up the program guide, I noticed I’d lost about 1/8th of my overall screen space to a new “advertisement slot” (photos below).  Worse yet, I’ve lost 2 (of 6) lines of the visible grid area, meaning I have to spend roughly 1/3 longer than before just to scroll through channels.

ld_comcastguide_withads1ld_comcastguide_withads2

What a terrible, terrible move.  Here are a few simple ways they could make this marginally better (assuming they won’t get rid of it):

  • Reduce the height of the ad to the same height as a grid item, giving me one line back
  • Only have it show up once every XX pages
  • Use the “top area” where the Comcast logo is instead, since that’s pretty much wasted space already
  • Make it slightly bigger, but then let me hide it once I’ve viewed it (it can reappear every XX minutes)

Or just give me the darn TiVo interface already – the one that was announced two years ago. Come on!

Posted in General, That's Janky, Video/Music/Media | 4 Comments |

Google Acquires CafePress, Launches Revolutionary AdWear

Posted on April 1, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

Google AdWearIn a flurry of Google-related news today (and even something from Microsoft), the company announced their intent to acquire the Internet-based custom clothes company CafePress.com.  Similar to the process with last year’s YouTube acquisition, the CafePress brand will remain intact as the company begins a multi-year technology integration.  With the acquisition, Google will also initiate a new service, dubbed AdWear, enabling personalized direct advertising on clothing.

In the AdWear program, advertisers have access to select the type of clothes they want to have their ads appear on, and may even select based on the sizing.  This flexibility and personalization is a “classic Google approach” as it allows the advertisers to directly target the markets they want to reach.  Thus a company such as Trojan could purchase ads on customized thongs and pajamas, while Krispy Kreme could focus on plus-sized clothing.

“Never before have advertisers had such control over asserting their brands on a truly individualized basis,” said Google’s Marissa Mayer.  “With AdWear, companies can finally reach out directly to the markets they have sought after for years.  We expect to see numerous cost-per-clothes campaigns begin shortly after the acquisition is closed.”

In a not-too-surprising move, Google further announced that all future products made by the CafePress team will ship to consumer for free.  Two sample designs are shown below:

Sample AdWear item

Sample AdWear item

For more details on this and other of today’s stories, read Nick Douglas’ thoughts here.

Posted in General, Web/Internet | 2 Comments |

Dozens and Dozens of Digital Picture Frames Sold!

Posted on March 30, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

Digital photography to me represents both the greatest and least tapped potential of all the digital media formats.  People who rip CDs (which, of course started digital, but that’s a pesky detail) into MP3 (or other) formats tend to listen to those files, probably on an iPod.  People who have DV cameras create videos that they are either instantly consuming and sharing, or archiving for the distant future (read: to embarrass friends and family members at the right moments).  But digital photos tend to be as much a nuisance as a blessing.

On a recent weeklong trip to Mexico I took over 300 pictures.  What happens next?  Well, now I have lots of pictures that take up lots of space on my hard drive.  I throw some of them online (I use Flickr personally), but am faced with the growing backup/archive dilemma (since I don’t currently trust any online service enough).  I’ll never delete them, since I don’t want to risk losing a single “memory”, and I’m terrified of a hard drive failure, so I need a backup.  I have a networked hard drive (currently a Maxtor Shared Storage Plus, but I’m about to migrate to an Infrant NV+), but frankly that’s still not enough for me because I live in San Francisco and one quick natural disaster and my backup’s gone too.  This spirals on from here…

So now I have all these pictures, what the heck am I supposed to do with them? I certainly can’t email them all to anybody, there’s just too many.  SO I need to pick a few here and there and share them explicitly.  I can print them or make a nice album (with Shutterfly).  I can make a t-shirt, hat, thong, or mug (with CafePress).  I can buy a relative a Presto-enabled printer, and send prints of my favorite pictures as I take them (full review of Presto coming soon – I think it’s a great concept, and I hope the implementation is as clean as it should be – if you haven’t heard of them, go to presto.com).

These are all good solutions for me sharing with others, but none really address me consuming my own photos on an ongoing basis.  I’ve liked the concept of a digital picture frame for years, but only now is the category actually emerging.  I noticed on Dave Zatz’ blog today a link to a recent report stating over 1.5MM units were sold in 2006.  Personally, I don’t really believe these numbers, it just sounds much too high and there’s a lack of sources from both the retail and manufacturer side.  But I do believe that this is a rapidly growing category that is poised for explosive growth.  For a glimpse into my “ultimate” digital picture frame, check out my post this week on NETGEAR’s blog.

Posted in General | 3 Comments |

For Bloggers: 10 Thoughts on Working With PR Firms

Posted on March 26, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

I interact with a lot of different bloggers, ranging from the “A-listers” (yes, you exist, and it’s okay, just stop denying it) to others barely out of the gates with their own blogs.  While it seems quite common to hear complaints about how PR firms should treat bloggers, I think bloggers could use a little advice as well on how to work within the marketing and communications industry.

This list is a second part to another one I wrote, aimed at PR People: 10 Thoughts on Improving Blogger Relations.

Incidentally, while some seem to loathe the term blogosphere, I like it.  Maybe it’s something that’ll fade away down the road, but for now, it’s here, and I use it pretty liberally.  Sorry ’bout that.

  1. Respect the efforts.  This is probably the most important point I’d like to make: like it or not, we are right now in the midst of a huge amount of flux in the marketing and journalism worlds.  The rules are changing, and changing fast.  Sure we can all want every PR firm on the planet to instantly adapt to the blogosphere and they should all “just get it” but that’s simply unrealistic, and more to the point, it’s unfair.  If someone from a PR firm approaches you and is clearly making an effort to reach out to you as an individual blogger, give them a little respect for that.  Want to make a change or improve their relations, well, give them feedback.  You’d be surprised how far it might go.
  2. Keep your ego in check. I read a lot of bloggers who want to be treated “extra special” all the time because of who they are or how big their readership is.  As much as I urge my clients to learn about and reach out to the blogosphere, I also give caution on understanding exactly how big the readership is.  Only the top-tier bloggers have audiences that truly warrant extra-special treatment.  Don’t act like some bigshot just because you have a few thousand readers a day, it just makes you look like you’ll take extra work to manage.  And from the other side of the business, when a PR firm has to pick and choose who they want to spend their time and resources managing, it’s going to be the “best bang for the buck” people, not the “pains in the rears” who can’t justify the efforts. 
  3. PR people are human too.  PR teams typically work long hours.  When big planned news hits, they may have worked around the clock to get it out on message and on time.  When big unplanned news hits, their lives are in chaos.  Trade shows? Fuhgedaboutit.  It’s not an excuse for rude or bad behavior on their part (which is unexcusable in my book), but remember that the person you are dealing with might be juggling literally dozens of conversations on an issue and might just mix up a detail here or there, or might forget to return your email within an hour.  Save the ‘tude for when you are on a real deadline – it’ll get you a lot further. The more mindful you are of what’s going on in their world, the better a job you’ll do at becoming a trusted resource in their eyes. 
  4. Learn the rules, and play by them. If a firm’s policy is to give review units for only 30 days, then expect the products back, it is up to you to mark your calendar.  They aren’t babysitters.  Ask for permission before posting emails, don’t assume you can just do whatever you want.  Blogging is not a license to do whatever you want in life – you can certainly request special/different treatment, but you must accept that you aren’t going to get absolutely everything you ask for!  While on the subject, it certainly wouldn’t hurt for you to start reading the occasional press release – it’s not the perfect form of communications, but you’ll sound a lot smarter if you avoid asking questions answered clearly within the release!
  5. Respect embargos.  I can’t stress this one well enough, so I’ll keep it short and simple:  you can either become known as a trustable outlet, or not.  Whichever one makes more sense to you, go for it, and don’t be surprised at the ramifications (either way).
  6. Be mindful of long-term relationships.  PR people are used to building relationships with journalists they work with.  They understand who covers which kinds of stories.  They know who is more likely to be accomodating of quirky products.  They also tend to have long memories and share with each other.  Obviously you can treat these relationships however you want, but the more you invest into it, the better you’ll get treated in the long term.
  7. Position your blog well.  Are you trying to be a “first scoop” site?  You want to have in-depth reviews?  Cover all the news of a particular niche?  Whatever you like to do with your blog is your prerogative, now make sure you position those goals clearly to the PR firms that approach you.  If you rarely/never write reviews, don’t be afraid to tell a firm you’d rather get the scoop than the product.  Easy hint here: make sure your about page talks through this!
  8. Create stories and pitch them.  Once you’ve created some relationships with PR teams, it’s okay to reach out to them.  For example, maybe you want to compare two MP3 players – tell your PR contacts what you are planning to write about, when it’s going live, and what aspects of the products you want to compare.  This is actually a great method of furthering your relationships with PR firms, as it makes you a lot more interesting in their eyes (being “another gadget site that shows the latest in gadget news” is a lot less interesting these days).
  9. Be mindful of being negative.  This doesn’t apply to everyone, but if you are new or an “up-and-coming” blogger, be very thoughtful before you go on some rampage.  If you tear apart some product or service, don’t expect them to reach out to you in the future.  It’s not to say you can’t be honest or critical, but be aware of what you are writing, and make sure it’s something you can stand behind in the long term.  Nobody wants you to say you loved a product you really didn’t like, but you can most certainly use your discretion before writing a post on “it’s the single worst gadget ever made, they should order a recall, dismantly every one by hand, then throw them into an acid pit to ensure nobody ever rebuilds the device the same way ever again”. You may want to consider notifying your PR contact that you had a bad experience or generally didn’t like a product before you go live, and constructive feedback is typically welcomed.
  10. Set expectations.  If you’ve begged and pleaded with a company to get a review unit, then take 180 days to write a review, you probably aren’t going to reap those rewards.  When a company offers to send me something to test out, I try (yes, try, because I’m not perfect either!) to let them know when I think a review will go live.  The better a job you do at managing expectations, the better they’ll think of you for future news items.

As a comment here, don’t forget that many of us (not all, I know) may have full-time jobs, and blogging is just something we “felt like doing” one day.  Maybe it’ll become a career for you, maybe you’ll give it up next week.  Expecting the entire PR/marketing industry to make a complete overhaul to their world in the span of a year or two to accomodate us isn’t exactly fair.  Change is afoot, and happening all around us right now, but don’t forget that it takes time.  My personal belief is I’d rather try to change the system from within than sit on the side and yell and scream about how stupid everyone else is…

To me, part of what’s so exciting about blogging is the reflection of the individual.  While I’ve clearly outlined some recommendations above on how to better interact with PR staff, I hope you understand this is about maximizing your potential as a blogger.  I’ve worked in marketing departments before and have personally engaged in blogger outreach and I can say this: it ain’t easy stuff. 

Posted in General | 4 Comments |

For PR People: 10 Thoughts on Improving Blogger Relations

Posted on March 26, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

It’s not exactly a new topic (see similar suggestions from Ryan Block, Lee Odden, Guy Kawasaki, Mike Arrington, Brian Solis, Tom Foremski, or Ken Yarmosh), but it’s one that I seem to get asked about a lot, so I figured I’d do my own diggbaiting Top Ten List on the topic. 

Also, this is one of two articles on the topic, the other is for the bloggers: 10 Thoughts on Working With PR Firms.

  1. Read the blog.  You don’t have to subscribe and read all the time, but take 2 minutes to scan even the last week’s worth of posts before approaching a blogger.  Whether we admit it or not, most some amount of blogging is ego-driven, so showing us that you read the content we write can make a huge difference in the response you’ll get.
  2. Have a goal.  Not every blogger is the same in the content they’ll write.  For example, I enjoy hands-on work with products but rarely just cover a product announcement, whereas other blogs prefer the opposite.  So if you want a review, make sure the blogger you are approaching actually writes reviews!
  3. Approach bloggers by name.  I rarely, if ever, respond to “Dear Editor” or unaddressed emails.  “Dear Jeremy” tends to get my attention over 90% of the time.  If you have the time to add me to your mailing list, you should have the time to add my name to it.
  4. Augment the press release.  The PR people who get my attention are the ones who add a few sentences or a paragraph to the body of the email in advance of the copy-and-pasted PR text.  The best ones take the time to tell me why they are sending me the release, especially if it’s in context to something I’ve covered before.  Many bloggers don’t like the conventional press release, so if you want to target them, you need to stay conscientious of this.
  5. Be ready for follow-up.  You have to be ready for us to respond to you and ask questions.  More importantly, you must have review units ready for bloggers.  I can’t stress this one enough – if you send me a release about a new product and don’t respond to my email asking for a review unit, I never cover it.  Even worse is when a firm sends me a product announcement, I respond with interest, and the rep asks me to tell them more about my blog! My recommendation here is if you aren’t going to let bloggers have review units/samples/freebies, then you probably shouldn’t bother them with your announcement.  Insert your own “cake and eat it too” metaphor.
  6. Categorize the blog.  Not all tech bloggers are the same.  Got a cool new digital camera?  You probably should approach Thomas Hawk before Dave Zatz or Mike Arrington.  Got a new Web service?  Hit up Mike, not the others.  New DVR or other home convergence device?  Dave is your guy.  Sure there are a lot of “tech generalists” out there too, but even they have their home turfs.  I, for example, do cover some Web services, but tend to focus more on consumer electronics and gadgetry.
  7. Build relationships.  PR firms tend to emphasize their strong relationships with key journalists such as Gary Krakow, David Pogue, Ed Baig, etc.  These are relationships built over time and are key to the longevity of the firms and the individuals working there.  You should put the same energy into your blogger relationships, or else not bother at all. Another important point here – if you’ve established an embargo on a topic, and you lift it early, it’s your responsibility to notify the bloggers too!
  8. Do your homework.  Most blogs have an ‘about’ page, in which you’ll discover the blogger’s full-time job (assuming it isn’t blogging), region of the country/world where they live, topics they prefer to cover, how they’d like to be contacted (bonus tip: IM or email is almost always the answer, not the phone), etc.  Read this and understand it.  Furthermore, doing a little background research will quickly tell you whether or not the blogger is good at keeping secrets/embargos (some do, some don’t – learn the difference).
  9. Understand their influence and influencers.  Something I tell all of my clients is to get to know the domino effects of bloggers and their circles.  I’ll use my blog as an example again: on a relative scale my readership is low in quantity, but extremely high in qualiy.  Nothing in PR is guaranteed, but it’s probably a lot cheaper, faster, and easier to get me to read something than the “top” bloggers out there (regardless of whether or not there is an A-list), and it’ll probably catch their attention faster to see me write about it than for you to inundate them with story requests.  The really good news is there’s lots of other influential, mid-tier bloggers like me out there to approach!
  10. Manage your stories.  If you want to send me something, great, but let me know in advance what your expectations are.  Do you want the unit back? If so, when?  Also, am I going to need anything to get the product working?  If so, what, and did you send me that too?  When I was at Sling Media, we made sure that we know about someone’s home network and TV setup before we sent them a unit!  For example, anyone who follows my blog knows I do not personally own an iPod, and probably should ask me how I’ll review an iPod accessory before they send me one!  Furthermore, stay in touch with us after you’ve sent something – is it working for us?  Do we like it? Also, as Ben from EngadgetHD reminds me, it’s fairly likely we aren’t working on “some” deadline, bloggers are typically in “I need this now” mode, so keep that in the back of your head!

If you’ve managed to read all the way through here, you’ve probably noticed a recurring theme around being involved with the blogger you are targetting.  We don’t have news bureaus scanning the wire.  We (typically) don’t have assistants to help us manage our time.  We probably have other jobs that are time-consuming.  More than anything else, my central theme is this: if you want to target a blogger, you must treat them with respect.  I’m not talking about butt-kissing here, I’m talking simple respect. 

Posted in General | 5 Comments |

Geek Dinner 2007:03

Posted on March 13, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

I skipped February in its entirety, but almost half of March managed to slip by before I was able to pull off another Geek Dinner.  With 20 RSVPS about 15 people in attendance, we again headed out to Buca di Beppo – a nice choice that is convenient for both South Bay and SF residents.

IMG_3554 Geek Dinner March 12 2007This month’s participants (following around the table from L-R):

  • Seth Kenvin – EIR at Venrock Associates
  • Doug Hagan – Netgear Marketing Guy, and more importantly, now a father of two!
  • Larry Chiang – Professional Multitasker
  • Mehrshad Mansouri – Person of ill-refute
  • Alan Peterson – Podcaster-for-hire (seriously, this man has an amazing voice)
  • Melanie Westlake – Has more phones than you do (probably because she works for Yahoo! Mobile)
  • Heidi Pollock – Mobile Web Guru (recently unemployed, so recruiters take note!)
  • Cindy Wang – from her friend Melanie: “she makes cute mobile web apps.  also, she is awesome”
  • Andrew Kippen – Carries “The Hammer” (when he’s not introducing French tech companies to Silicon Valley for the French Trade Commission)
  • Harry McCracken – Knows more about PCs than, well, most everyone else (also Editor-in-Chief for PC World)
  • Jeremy Toeman – About to engage in new career as “professional twitter user”
  • Daniel Riveong – Just *wishes* he can carry The Hammer, instead is merely a Social Media Expert
  • Jason Vagner – Recently employed! Huzzah!
  • Dave Mathews – Backward Thinker
  • Noah Kagan – Trying to find the appropriate floor to sleep on (also recently organized the Community Next event)

Great group with great conversations all around.  One topic we floated through started as “how many gadgets is too many to carry” and ended up being something more like “so what gadget do you really want to carry?”  This originated as follows – if you can think back 10 years ago (try, seriously), the most gadgets we carried around regularly was a cell phone (and that’s only if you were way ahead of the curve).  By 2000 it probably included a PDA as well.  By 2002, throw either an MP3 player or digital camera (or both) into the bag.  It seems pretty clear that people aren’t truly pushing back on carrying more than 2 digital gizmos around these days.  The thing I wonder about is when is enough enough? 

IMG_3575 larry and heidi and their sidekicksI also gave (another) anti-Twitter-hype rant, which then managed to include an anti-Second Life-hype rant, all at the expense of poor Heidi, who had the backbone to defend her postion and the character to not get all pissed at me for debating to the nth degree.  But since I won’t use the T-word more than once per post, that was it, and it’s time to move along!  Also (pictured to the right), Heidi and Larry bonded over having the same phones as 17-year-old girls.

We had another round of “pass around the gadgets” in which I showed off:

  • The latest Seagate FreeAgent Go portable hard drive (full review coming soon – but quick verdict is – very convenient, easy to use, and stylish).  Group consensus: YAY.
  • An AC-DC power converter from TeleAdapt (a division of APC) that works on airplanes AND cars and provides a standard (US) outlet to charge most devices.  Beats carrying “tips” around.  Group consensus: YAY.
  • The Netgear DECT Skype phone which allows one handset to work with both POTS and Skype services.  Group consensus: YAY.
  • Back for a second time, and thanks to Mehrshad now with one extra feature, my favorite Quik-Pod!  Group consensus: YAY.

IMG_3563 divx watchAlso, Dave Mathews showed us a Divx-enabled watch he brought back from Asia.  Not bad, although 15fps video still isn’t all that watchable… Hahahah.  Oh, sorry.  Yes, I know.  Yes, terrible.  Ok, ok, I won’t do it again.

By the way, for those wondering about the original topic on how many gadgets and ideal gadgets?  A common theme emerged: can someone, anyone, just make a basic cell phone that…

  1. has decent reception across the US
  2. has good battery life
  3. doesn’t take photos, play games, show maps, stream TV, or anything else
  4. doesn’t look like it came free in a Cracker Jack box
  5. isn’t a Razr

I’d buy one.  I’m actually in the market for a new phone right now, and I realized how little I do want/need from the phone.  I’ll take anything that meets the above description.  Anyone got a suggestion?

IMG_3564 cables for everyoneLast up, as I mentioned yesterday, I’m trying to rid a lot of cables from my apartment.  I brought a box full of them to the Geek Dinner to see if anyone wanted any.  There were a few takers here and there, but truth be told, it was as much a purging exercise as anything else.   But when Harry told me I made his day by supplying him with a new set of RCA cables, I was thrilled!

As always, email or comment if you’d like to get on the list for the next one…

Posted in General | 3 Comments |

Googling First Names

Posted on March 12, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

Before I get to the heart of the post, my “manual Twitter update” is: I’m sitting on my couch.  More fun lifeblogging later, mkay?

I have no idea what my inspiration here was, but I decided it’d be interesting (kinda) to find the most common first names (in the US) and see the results when Googled.  I know that Google is supposed to be the end-all be-all definitive answer to all things, but as you’ll see fairly quickly, the list doesn’t really reflect “the real world” nearly as much as you might expect.

The Boys

  1. JAMES: The band, James.
    1. Ignoring Google Music, the result is “James Project” – an open-source mail server
    2. The first “person” in the list is James I of England
  2. JOHN: Gospel of John.  John Kerry is the first name in the list
  3. ROBERT: Need you ask?  It’s Mr. Scoble (ahead of De Niro, Redford, etc)!
  4. MICHAEL: Michaels Arts & Crafts Store (that’s some good SEO).  Michael Jackson is first, with Arrington second, then Moore third.  My friend Michael Gartenberg appears on the 6th page, but MJ himself didn’t appear in the first 10 pages!  Says something about where sports, bloggers, technology & Google go together, eh?
  5. WILLIAM:  Wait for it… Actually, I can’t bear to say it.  Go ahead, see for yourself.  No comment.
  6. DAVID: Interestingly it references the former King, with a David Pescovitz nudging in just ahead of Ziggy Stardust.  No, I won’t explain that, or any other pop culture references from this point forward.
  7. RICHARD: Another king, Richard I of England, but he’s followed by another top blogger, Richard MacManus, who is only a few spots ahead of Richard Simmons.
  8. CHARLES: Charles Schwab has SEO’d themselves above King Charles.  Apparently Princes do not fare as well, as Prince Charles can’t beat out “The Fishbowl: Charles Miller’s Weblog“
  9. JOSEPH: Another Biblical reference (Hebrew before Saint), and it’s not until the bottom of the first page until I found professor Jospeh Stiglitz.
  10. THOMAS: Didn’t know about this one before, the THOMAS online Library of Commerce.  Good ol’ Thomas Hawk is the first name on the list (and another blogger – I think I smell a trend!).
  11. CHRISTOPHER: The first link is about Chrisopher Columbus’ ships, and the first name is non-blogger Chris Walken.  If I switch the term to just ‘CHRIS’ then Pirillo’s blog is on top.
  12. DANIEL: First up is a prophet, and new James Bond Daniel Craig is the first written name, but Darren Scocco’s blog is extremely well SEO’d since his name isn’t even in the title!
  13. PAUL: Religion beats blogger in this case, as the prophet is first, McCartney second, and Paul Stamatiou’s blog wins the bronze.
  14. MARK: Mark Pilgrim’s linkblog is up on top, which surprised me as I figured the BlogMaverick would be higher up there (he’s also stuck behind a prophet, which clearly doesn’t bode well).
  15. DONALD: Even before I clicked the button, I was pretty sure I’d find The Donald as the first result.
  16. GEORGE: Quite the popular name in Googling, with the fun Where’s George site ranked above our first president (who is thankfully ranked above our current one).  Scroll down a little and you’ll see Clooney beats out Lucas on IMDB – I guess that’s not ranked by income, eh?
  17. KENNETH: Got Shoes?  More interesting is the second result, a spa in Columbus, Ohio.
  18. STEVEN: Again, a blogger (Steven Berlin Johnson) beats out directors Spielberg and Soderbergh.  I guess I figured Jobs for #1, but he’s barely on the first page.
  19. EDWARD: Naperville’s (Illinois) own somehow managed to eke out the top position above a quite famous King, and Edward Hopper is the first ‘name’ on the page.
  20. BRIAN: ABC has SEO’d some TV show into the first slot, ahead of extremely popular blogger Brian Clark.
  21. RONALD: My favorite result so far, as it juxtaposes Ronald McDonald and Ronald Reagan a few times over.  That’s just plain fun!
  22. ANTHONY: The men’s products company is first (I use two of their scrubs, love em – ain’t that just so metrosexual of me?), and we have no bloggers whatsoever in the first 10 (I smell opportunity).  Tony Robbins and Marc Anthony both place ahead of the first full Anthony, Sir Hopkins.
  23. KEVIN: CNN correspondant Kevin Sites has wedged himself in at #1.  Have no fear, K-Fed is only a few links below.
  24. JASON: The second project on our list, the JASON project, is first up.  Entrepreneur-turned corporate America-turned VC-turned fatblogger Jason Calacanis is in the top 5, just below the Greek myth entry at Wikipedia.
  25. MATTHEW:  I kept repeating in my head “Don’t be Perry, Don’t be Perry!” as I hit the search button.  Biblical reference comes in first, with actor Matthew McConaughey a few steps behind.

…

  1. JEREMY: Damn that Zawodny!!!  I’m up in the first 5 pages, but it seems as if people named Jeremy just like to get their blogging on…

The Girls

  1. MARY: Yup, it’s the Biblical one first (she dominates most of the page actually).  Then the first real name we get to is Mary J Blige.
  2. PATRICIA: A resort chain in Myrtle Beach is the first listing here, then we get famous (?) children’s book author Patricia Polacco’s Web site next.
  3. LINDA: And there we have it, our first result wherein our first listing is adult content.  Congratulations, Linda Tran, you are our winner.  Incidentally, three other Lindas on the first page are also adult-oriented.  So if there are any Lindas reading this who are not working in the porn industry, maybe you can start a blog soon?
  4. BARBARA: It looks like Google considers Barbara Nitke’s “Sexuality Project” the most prominent Barbara, with Ms. Streisand (my mom’s lookalike you know) in second place.
  5. ELIZABETH: Let’s see, we have Movie Reference, Queen, Queen, Queen, Queen, Queen, and Movie Reference.
  6. JENNIFER:  J. Lo may not be as popular in the gossip rags anymore, but she’s still all the rage on Google. 
  7. MARIA: I was genuinely surprised to see WWE “superstar” Maria first and tennis player Sharapova second.  That’s two sports people (well, 1.5?) on top here.
  8. SUSAN: Some astrologist is on top, so I’ll do my share to try to help get blogger Susan Mernit ranked higher.  If you don’t read it already, I humbly suggest you subscribe to Susan’s great blog right away!
  9. MARGARET:  CHO.  IS. FIRST.
  10. DOROTHY:  They’ve got her.  And her little dog too.
  11. LISA:  I think this was the first time two different acronyms had the top two spots.  Lisa Simpson is the first ‘name’ on the page, and a Lisa McPherson is the first ‘real name’ later on.
  12. NANCY:  I feel like we’re getting a little, I don’ t know, desperate at this point.  The “comic” strip is the first entry, followed by Nancy Sinatra and Nancy Reagan.
  13. KAREN:  This little project has just taught me something new.  Did you know there was a tribe of people called the Karen people (I’ll bet ya didn’t)?  I didn’t.  I feel a little bad too, as there are apparently 14 million of them!  We’ve also found another blogger (it’s been a while!), Karen Schneider, the Free Range Librarian.
  14. BETTY: Hm… Pop band I’ve never heard of, color for Hair Down There, some cookbooks, ugliness, … ah, there we go… “Stale Betty: Voted Most Likely to Wear Granny Panties“
  15. HELEN: Helen, Sweetheart of the Internet is probably a minor misnomer, since it seems that Helen of Troy is the sweetheart entry here.
  16. SANDRA: Sandra Bullock is our first named entry, but can’t beat the geeks’ SiSoftware.  I wonder if she’s that high in some part due to the movie The Net?
  17. DONNA: Congratulations to Donna Nammer, the first female blogger to pwn her first name on Google.  I wonder if she knows Scoble?
  18. CAROL: And back we go to corporate stuff.  In fact, the name Carol seems so open on Google that Carole King makes the first page (although that could be due to typos as well). 
  19. RUTH: Mmm, steak house.  Actually, no full-name Ruths made the first page of results at all, unless you count Babe Ruth that is.
  20. SHARON: Utterly dominated by Ariel Sharon, Sharon Stone, and a bunch of small US towns named Sharon.
  21. MICHELLE: Journalist Michelle Malkin is on top.  Have no fear boys, there’s nudity only one link away.
  22. LAURA: Interestingly, more right-wing women are at the top here, with Laura Ingraham and Laura Bush just behind the movie of the same name.
  23. SARAH: Back to the Bible we go, but the Canadian singer Sarah McLachlan is in second place.
  24. KIMBERLY: Get your tissues, all your tissues!  The only actual name on the page is a Kimberley who blogs at Develsaa.com.
  25. DEBORAH: A hospital in New Jersey (what exit?) ranks first, then back to the Bible, then Ms. Electric Youth herself, Debbie Deborah Gibson!

There you have it, the Top 50 Google results for the Top 50 First Names.  What did we learn (remembering that Google ranks primarily based on links)?

  • Bloggers beat actors.
  • Musicians beat actors.
  • Prophets beat bloggers.
  • Kings of England beat everyone other than Scoble.
  • Women often link to men.
  • Women sometimes link to women.
  • Men often link to men.
  • Men sometimes link to women.
  • Men often link to pornography.
  • William Hung’s 15 minutes have last way too long.
Posted in General | 14 Comments |

Treasureful Huntings of San Francisco for Make Benefit Glorious New Years of China

Posted on March 6, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

IMG_3465 team Boarat Treasureful Huntings of San Francisco for Make Benefit Glorious New Years of ChinaAround this time every year, a clever man named Jayson Wechter organizes the San Francisco Treasure Hunt.  And every time around this year, a much less clever man named Jeremy Toeman smacks himself in the head for missing out on the fabled event.  But 2007 saw a collision of fate so grand it was impossible to avoid.  The alignment of my birthday and the hunt on the exact same day! 

The first, and possibly most important, task was to come up with a name.  I went gunning to win:

The Jayson Wechter “I Never-Met-a-Pun-I Didn’t Like Award” is given to the teams with the cleverest names, which are often related to the year of the Chinese zodiac (2007 is the Year of the Boar).

And thus… Boarat: Treasureful Huntings of San Francisco for Make Benefit Glorious New Years of China.  Didn’t win.

IMG_3455 clueNext up, the hunt itself.  Not sure when it went up (then down), but there was a Web page with some clues prior to the hunt.  To the right is a sample clue.  That was about the most obvious moment of the event (all my other photos of the event are online here). 

We met up at Justin Herman plaza, ready to psych up for the hunting, and amidst the 900-or-so people (here’s one account and another one here) became determined to finish in the top 5 percentile (for those of you who find that ambitious, keep in mind this means we really just didn’t want to be in the bottom 5).  A glance around at cleverly costumed teams and we felt a little, well, woozy.

IMG_3477 bart station to get under market streetUpon the beginnings of the hunt, we saw most teams grab a sitting place in the plaza or on a nearby table.  We naturally immediately set out for a nearby bar and ordered a couple of pitchers.  We did a little divide and conquer, and about 45 minutes later had all 19 of the clues “mostly solved” and a mapped out plan to find our answers.  Our first clue went off without a hitch, as did our second.  By number three, we hit the Chinatown Parade.  Luckily, we dashed under Market street to avoid the chaos, although got stuck a few more times (although the detour/pee break at the Westin was a nice moment).

Everything was going great through the first 7 or 8 clues.  We’d arrive in a location, quickly narrow down the specific target, jot down an answer, and be off like the wind within moments.  We’d play little games with other teams, making oddball references to nonexistent clues and other forms of misdirection, and our spirits were high.

IMG_3484 steps down from coit towerThen we got stuck on one clue in North Beach.  Then, disaster struck as we made the ever-so-costly mistake of misinterpreting another clue and walking all the way up to Coit Tower.  Yes, all the way up.  We were tired.  Not enough hamantaschen to go around.  One of our flashlights was dying.  But we rallied nonetheless! 

We headed down the steps, toward the water and our next clue.  Within moments we were back on track, but were perilously low on time.  We did a little walk-jogging.  Two, three, then four more clues nailed within minutes.  Team Boarat was back on a roll, we were the virtual kings of our castles. 

With less than 10 minutes left to go, we made the ambitious move of going for two final clues.  One we got, the other we didn’t (we later found out we were less than a block away), and we ran back to Justin Herman plaza to submit our entries.  And with that, we knew we were winners. 

IMG_3485 team Boarat Treasureful Huntings of San Francisco for Make Benefit Glorious New Years of ChinaNot because we got the most right (We got 16 of 19).

Not because we were fastest (The winning team was done 40 minutes earlier.  Jerks.)

Not because we had kick-ass red buttons that said we we finished.

Why?

Because… Well…  Unlike some other teams, I get a clock radio, they cannot afford. Great success!

Posted in General, No/Low-tech | 2 Comments |

Spotplex – A different kind of Site Voting

Posted on February 28, 2007 by Guest Contributor

A new site called Spotplex launched recently and it has a different way to find highly rated sites different than the way Digg does. Instead of having users rate your site like Digg does, your site is rated by how many views a certain page or post receives. The more views the higher rated your page or post receives. This is done by the webmaster putting a small java script in the page and whenever it is viewed it gets counted by Spotplex.

The results on their site look similar to Digg, showing very popular content, latest content, or by tags or publisher.
The first thing that comes to mind is how they are going to handle the possibility for abuse or mislabeling. Hopefully they have thought this through carefully and have devised some ways to handle it. They also do not have a place to comment on the post, like Digg does To comment you would have to go to the original site and page. This is great for the original site because it forces people to go back to the originating site to make comments. Not too great for the user, most like to comment directly at the post, like Digg does.

They are taking only 1,000 blogs right now, and is still in Beta. I can definetly see a problem with the loading speed of the site. They will need to fix this right away if people are going to stick around and they are going to grow. They also have several different ways sites can create widgets or embed code into their own page to show specific posts based upon a selected criteria. They also have added RSS feeds to the site. But, again the feed is very slow to load.

Posted in General | Leave a comment |

Hey, NBC, stop trying to spoil Heroes for me!

Posted on February 26, 2007 by Jeremy Toeman

As I’ve posted before, I’m a big fan of the show Heroes, for many reasons.  One of the things I really like about it is that unlike Lost/Twin Peaks/XFiles, it’s a quirky show that doesn’t have a huge weird mystery that may or may not get resolved to my satisfaction.  It has a plotline, and it clearly has twists and turns, but should it end this season, I won’t be wondering what it’s all about forever.

Also, despite it being so semi-geeky a show, it’s captured the #1 slot for Mondays, and is one of NBC’s highest-rated shows.  But yet any time, day or night, that I turn on NBC, there it is, a preview for Heroes, chock full of suspenseful-looking spoiler-ridden clips.  And it’s driving me nuts.

See, I’ve got this little problem in that, if I see something in a preview, I tend to remember it the whole time I’m watching the show.  So if I see fire in the preview, I’m waiting for fire in the show.  Doesn’t matter how quick, I notice it.  I’m not exactly bragging here, by the way, that part of my brain could clearly be used for more important things, but I just can’t seem to turn it off.

So please, team NBC, I beg of you: stop with all the footage from the upcoming episodes.  You have a huge fan base, and based on the number of fan sites all over the ‘net, you aren’t losing us any time soon.  So how about you let us decide when we want to go find a spoiler, and when we don’t?  You have plenty of footage to continue to get new viewers without ruining it for the rest of us.

And by the way, this goes for your Web site too!  If I want spoilers, I’ll seek them out (probably here – warning, that link CONTAINS SPOILERS!).  It’s not like you’re trying to peddle us on a series based on “From Justin to Kelly” or something…

Posted in General, No/Low-tech | 2 Comments |
« Previous Page
Next Page »

About

Jeremy Toeman is a seasoned Product leader with over 20 years experience in the convergence of digital media, mobile entertainment, social entertainment, smart TV and consumer technology. Prior ventures and projects include CNET, Viggle/Dijit/Nextguide, Sling Media, VUDU, Clicker, DivX, Rovi, Mediabolic, Boxee, and many other consumer technology companies. This blog represents his personal opinion and outlook on things.

Recent Posts

  • Back on the wagon/horse?
  • 11 Tips for Startups Pitching Big Companies
  • CES 2016: A New Role
  • Everything I Learned (So Far) Working For a Huge Company
  • And I’m Back…

Archives

Pages

  • About

Archives

  • January 2019
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004

Categories

  • Convergence (81)
  • Gadgets (144)
  • Gaming (19)
  • General (999)
  • Guides (35)
  • LD Approved (72)
  • Marketing (23)
  • Mobile Technology (111)
  • Networking (22)
  • No/Low-tech (64)
  • Product Announcements (85)
  • Product Reviews (109)
  • That's Janky (93)
  • Travel (29)
  • Video/Music/Media (115)
  • Web/Internet (103)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

CyberChimps WordPress Themes

© LIVEdigitally