• About

LIVEdigitally

Is Good good for Motorola?

Posted on November 10, 2006 by Jeremy Toeman

By the time you’re reading this, all the top tech/mobility blogs have already mentioned the fact that Motorola announced today they are buying Good Technology.  If not, find a source you like and read about it: TechDirt, Engadget Mobile, BBhub, Experience Mobility, PDAstreet, CrunchGear, TreoCentral.  Ok, now you are up to speed, right?  Good.  Or is it?

When I think about the future of mobile phones, convergence, and business functionality, I see the world playing out in two camps:  serving the needs of individuals/small businesses or serving large companies’ interests.  Email on mobile phones isn’t really important for the non-business community, as SMS really serves their needs just fine.  Furthermore the average teenager or college kid can’t really afford a powerful smartphone (or its requisite data plan) and thats a hard sell even for their rich parents.  So let’s make it a bit of a given that acquiring Good is specifically to bolster Motorola’s offerings to the business community.

So for a small business, let’s say an individual like myself (or doctor, attorney, etc) or a small startup, what kind of mobile email needs do they have?  They probably do not have a dedicated Exchange server, so they have hosted POP3 accounts.  Furthermore, odds are pretty good they want to save costs on infrastructure buildout, so ideally they can purchase the phone(s) they need without buying huge servers or other back-end technology.  Also, they really need a solution with minimal IT requirements as they are probably handling this themselves, or have a friend or cheap consultant.  Either way, my hunch is they need solutions that work out of the box with as little maintenance as possible.  While I was a huge Palm fan back in the 90s, the OS has lost its way in the broadband era.  This leaves RIM and Microsoft as the other players in the space.  Motorola ships the Q phone, which runs Windows Mobile 5, which is an ideal solution for the above scenario.  While they’ve bundled the Good application with it, it seems like one of those things that doesn’t get used very much.  In my opinion, Good doesn’t seem to add value in this equation.

Next up, big businesses.  Big companies have IT departments.  IT departments generally prefer hassle-free solutions that are reliable and don’t break down on them, because they don’t like getting phone calls at 2am from their executives who are overseas and can’t check their email while bored in Heathrow.  Again, we come down to RIM and Microsoft as two very viable solutions.  With the inclusion of push-email from Windows Mobile 5, and its excellent integration with Exchange, I again fail to see a compelling value-add from Good. 

Maybe I’m missing something here, but I just don’t get the reasoning for this one.  It seems like an unnecessary buy by Moto.  Maybe they plan to ditch WM5 as an operating system?  Maybe there are some key patents?  Maybe they want to prevent the technology from going elsewhere?  Hopefully this won’t be one of those acquisitions that gets looked back upon as simply being Bad.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Reddit

Related

Posted in General, Mobile Technology | 3 Comments
« Geek Dinner 360
Best Movie Trailer Ever »

3 thoughts on “Is Good good for Motorola?”

  1. tivoboy says:
    November 10, 2006 at 3:17 pm

    I like it, Good I mean,

    but it does beg the question,

    What good is Good?

    With the latest, Exchange Server 2003, SP2, and push technology coming to most WM5, or smartphone devices, this enables all the same services at a fraction of the cost. By that, I mean basically NO cost. I use the push tech on my dash – ( great device, my buddy JT had one and that meant I just HAD to have it) and it doesn’t cost me a dang thang!.

    Well, to get it all squared away on an exhange DOES cost me 1.99$ a month, but I can pack that without having to use the Good software or some other. Granted, this is only for WM devices and they are most likely considering it a loss leader to build market share in the software that runs on the devices (same old Microsoft, just MORE, SMALLER devices this time!)

    Whereas Good has to work it out vendor by vendor, make it work on each device and then find the market.

    What does GOOD offer me that WM push doesn’t? Yeah, folder sync, offline file structure access, but are you REALLY going to be doing that on your mobile device, at least today?

    Reply
  2. tivoboy says:
    November 10, 2006 at 3:20 pm

    I will add though, that I didn’t understand the Ebay acquisition of Skype at first either,

    wait a minute, I STILL don’t understand the ebay acquisition of Skype!

    GGGG,

    Good getting out while the Getting is GOOD!

    Reply
  3. BrianH says:
    November 11, 2006 at 6:18 pm

    Correct on the audience, Motorola is wanting to capture more enterprise mindshare (and revenue). But you clearly haven’t used Good in an enterprise setting if you call RIM and Microsoft the only viable options. The Good client set (including all PIM and optional http/s access) is a fully integrated and very robust experience, one providing a great deal of security and management on the back end. The ability to push applications and data wirelessly, for example, brings the capability of Good beyond that of ‘pushing an email to a handheld’. This is the reason for Good to exist, and they have done quite well against both RIM and Microsoft in this market.

    I was at a meeting with a small software vendor, and their executive was using MSFT and was unable to sync or receive email. His support and IT team was unable to tell him why, and they had no Tech Support to call. While my Good email was syncing, if it wasn’t my IT team could ‘look’ at the device through their web console and troubleshoot the issue. And see the client version, OS and ROM versions, and device type. Try that with MSFT or RIM.

    I think it gives Motorola enterprise clout and a new entry into the enterprise market, which may only be one segment but a very attractive one nonetheless.

    Reply

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About

Jeremy Toeman is a seasoned Product leader with over 20 years experience in the convergence of digital media, mobile entertainment, social entertainment, smart TV and consumer technology. Prior ventures and projects include CNET, Viggle/Dijit/Nextguide, Sling Media, VUDU, Clicker, DivX, Rovi, Mediabolic, Boxee, and many other consumer technology companies. This blog represents his personal opinion and outlook on things.

Recent Posts

  • Back on the wagon/horse?
  • 11 Tips for Startups Pitching Big Companies
  • CES 2016: A New Role
  • Everything I Learned (So Far) Working For a Huge Company
  • And I’m Back…

Archives

Pages

  • About

Archives

  • January 2019
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004

Categories

  • Convergence (81)
  • Gadgets (144)
  • Gaming (19)
  • General (999)
  • Guides (35)
  • LD Approved (72)
  • Marketing (23)
  • Mobile Technology (111)
  • Networking (22)
  • No/Low-tech (64)
  • Product Announcements (85)
  • Product Reviews (109)
  • That's Janky (93)
  • Travel (29)
  • Video/Music/Media (115)
  • Web/Internet (103)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

CyberChimps WordPress Themes

© LIVEdigitally
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.