• About

LIVEdigitally

Why the Mac Mini is not, at all, an Apple TV

Posted on June 16, 2010 by Jeremy Toeman

Lots of musing yesterday that the new Mac Mini is a “Apple TV in disguise.”  It’s not.  Here’s why:

  1. Price
    There’s a world of difference between seven hundred and one or two or even three hundred dollars.  This is even more the case in the icing room as opposed to the ipad or mobile devices, where theres no precedent or parallel for the product.  Further people evaluate living room stuff extremely differently, and seven hundo is like buying two xbox 360s.  Too much.  In fact, you can truly skip the entire rest of this piece, since this price is an utter non-starter for this discussion.
  2. But what about HDMI?
    Just because the product has hdmi doesn’t mke it a living room product.  Sure front row or Boxee will have that effect, but there’s a radical difference between a purposeful and incidental use case for a device like this.  Hdmi is there because it’s replaced dvi as the digital video standard, and because a huge screen does make a beautiful monitor.  An interconnect does not alone a product make, otherwise I’d be comparing the Mac Mini to a router because it has an Ethernet port.
  3. Software
    Per the above comment, today it’s front row or nothing, from apple direct.  Yes, users can download Boxee or plex, but to think consumers en masse will throw down seven hundred dollars for this solution is way off the mark.  For that purpose, they’d just buy an apple tv, or a roku or a wdtv, etc.
  4. But what about New Software?
    Okay, it’s fairly naive of me to say the future of this scenario is the existing version of front row.  Obviously they’ll rev it, and lets assume the rev is solid.  Per all the above points, it doesn’t matter how much better it is.  It’s not about a “better experience” when we are talking the price point.
  5. The Apple Way
    Apple makes products with high margins, mass appeal, and excellent software.  A seven hundred dollar apple tv is only one of those things, and at best can get to two.  Why would they make such a bizarre strategy shift here?  It’s not, at all, the apple way.  Far from it.
  6. Consumers and boxes
    Most consumers don’t buy extra boxes for their living rooms.  They buy TVs, game consoles, and media playback devices (the cheapest of the bunch).  When they do buy add ons, they tend to be under $300, such as the slingbox, roku, or wdtv.  In these cases, the value add for the price point is clear.  So looking at the new Mac mini from the lens of ‘what new content or services does this bring to the living room?’ the answer is practically nil.
  7. Consumers and content
    Cable tv (and by that i include satellite and other existing offerings) is, on average, pretty good.  The average American has access to tons of content, both on broadcast and on demand systems, not to mention whatever they are dvring.  Throw in a dvd player and a game console, and the content universe is quite outstanding.  The quantity of people who truly want to throw away their existing stuff is really really small.  Its not to say there isn’t room to add in more, but its not seven hundred dollars worth more in any consumers’ eyes. For a box that expensive to earn a spot in the living room, it must supplant existing content offerings in such a way that consumers clearly perceive the value.  So not only is a brand new software package a requirement, but a massive increase in content, especially free content, is as well.

But What If?

If apple discontinued the apple tv line, this would have a shift, but only a minor one.  In that scenario, I’d imagine the opportunity truly shines for google tv products and the Boxee box by dlink (full disclosure: I consult with dlink), as they will offer similar value propositions but at steeply discounted prices.  And unlike the comparisons between the iPad and the janky tablet rivals, these other products are far more likely to show promise and value.  Still doesn’t add up.
And now for something completely different.
A man talking about the same topic, in video form:

Watch live video from Jeremy Toeman on Justin.tv

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Reddit

Related

Posted in Convergence | Tags: Apple, apple tv, boxee, dlink, hdmi, mac mini, roku, wdtv | 6 Comments
« GIVING NOTICE: I'm reclaiming Facebook for personal use
How to Turn On FaceTime on iPhone 4 »

6 thoughts on “Why the Mac Mini is not, at all, an Apple TV”

  1. bijan sabet says:
    June 16, 2010 at 10:28 am

    great points and I largely agree with you on the price issue

    but it wasn’t that long ago that consumers weren’t willing to spend $30-$50/month for unlimited data on their mobile phones and now they do.

    i think the family room experience needs to get better and consumers will pay more.

    Reply
  2. Bob A says:
    June 16, 2010 at 1:01 pm

    A Mac Mini is a PC and has that price point period. Apple should be deciding what their TV play is now that Google has tossed our GoogleTv. I bought an AppleTV a few years ago to try the experience and while it works it’s not the greatest but it works as advertised. I would use it before my Xbox360 as a media player.

    Reply
  3. Ron says:
    June 16, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    While I agree with your answer, I have a different view on the question. So, is the mac mini Apple TV? No, for all the reasons you clearly articulate.

    But how about this, is the mac mini a signal? An intention? There, the answer is a clear yes (IMHO). Apple is telling the market (both consumers and competitors) that it is now serious about TV and that TV is no longer a “hobby.” Apple is saying something is in the works so if you’re thinking about investing in webTV, wait, because Apple is coming.

    With this move it is effectively stalling the market and preventing consumers from making the jump into other products for fear they will make an investment and then miss whatever Apple has up its sleeve.

    Apple has not shown any interest in HDMI up until now (that was one of my major irritating discoveries AFTER I bought my iPad, I just assumed it would have HDMI). But now, whoa, HDMI???? So they’ve found religion… what else is there?

    Reply
  4. tivoboy says:
    June 17, 2010 at 7:07 am

    This is actually and unfortunately, the direction of the MM pricing. It started at 499$, then was 599$ when it came out with the intel chips, and now 699$. Not the direction of MOST tech products pricing, but seems to be the way for apple and the MM.

    Reply
  5. Udo Schroeter says:
    June 21, 2010 at 8:07 pm

    In Germany, this thing costs more than 800 Euros, now that’s just insane. I suppose they’re getting ready to shoot the Mac Mini in the head and part of that plan would be to make the iPad cheap by comparison.

    I own several Mac laptops, a Mac Pro, and a previous-gen Mac Mini – but recently I’m starting to wonder where they’re going with this. At just 300 more than that new Mac Mini (which hasn’t gotten that much of a hardware upgrade to begin with) you can buy a decent iMac or Macbook. Seriously, who would want to buy this?

    Consider what insane PC hardware you could buy for 800+ Euros: if you can envision yourself working on a Windows or Linux box, you’ll be getting way more bang for those bucks. :-/

    Reply
  6. BLC says:
    August 18, 2010 at 4:40 am

    I don’t know where you get your ideas from, but HDMI has emphatically not replaced DVI as the standard interconnect for display devices. In the Apple world – as far as I know – Display Port rules supreme. In the PC world however, DVI is ubiquitous, with some Display Port uptake. Many (in fact most high end) graphics cards will have an HDMI port built in (or some kind of DVI to HDMI adaptor), but that’s there for consumer convenience – just in case they do decide to plug their PC into the TV, or use the card in an HTPC setup.

    Yes a huge screen – as in an LCD TV – does make for a good monitor, but it can never match the quality that a dedicated computer monitor offers. For starters, the range of resolutions available on even mid-range computer monitors far outstrips that available on consumer televisions. Never mind discussions on refresh rates, latency times, colour quality, etc. This is why computer monitors are comparitively more expensive than LCD TV’s, even models with the same screen size. Plus, you will be hard-pressed to find a broad range of computer monitors that also accept an HDMI input; even Apple’s flagship Cinema displays use Display Port, AFAIK. Sure there will be the odd one or two, but they are the exception rather than the rule.

    For the record, I am neither an Apple-hater nor a PC zealot. I have owned Macbooks in the past, but every time I always find myself going back to the PC. The Mac platform just does not suit what I want to do with a computer.

    Reply

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About

Jeremy Toeman is a seasoned Product leader with over 20 years experience in the convergence of digital media, mobile entertainment, social entertainment, smart TV and consumer technology. Prior ventures and projects include CNET, Viggle/Dijit/Nextguide, Sling Media, VUDU, Clicker, DivX, Rovi, Mediabolic, Boxee, and many other consumer technology companies. This blog represents his personal opinion and outlook on things.

Recent Posts

  • Back on the wagon/horse?
  • 11 Tips for Startups Pitching Big Companies
  • CES 2016: A New Role
  • Everything I Learned (So Far) Working For a Huge Company
  • And I’m Back…

Archives

Pages

  • About

Archives

  • January 2019
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004

Categories

  • Convergence (81)
  • Gadgets (144)
  • Gaming (19)
  • General (999)
  • Guides (35)
  • LD Approved (72)
  • Marketing (23)
  • Mobile Technology (111)
  • Networking (22)
  • No/Low-tech (64)
  • Product Announcements (85)
  • Product Reviews (109)
  • That's Janky (93)
  • Travel (29)
  • Video/Music/Media (115)
  • Web/Internet (103)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

CyberChimps WordPress Themes

© LIVEdigitally
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.